| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2007] All ER (D) 407 (Mar) |
| Neutral Citation: | [2006]EWCA Crim 2564 |
| Court: | Court of Appeal, Criminal Division |
| Judge: | Holland J and Sir John Blofeld |
| Representation | Jonathan Clarke (assigned by the Registrar of Criminal Appeals) for the defendant. |
| Julian Taylor (instructed by the Crown Prosecution Service) for the Crown. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 6 October 2006 |
Catchwords
Sentence - Imprisonment - Length of sentence - Possession of a Class A drug - Being concerned in the supply of a Class A drug - Whether sentence manifestly excessive. .
The Case
Sentence Imprisonment.Where the defendant had pleaded guilty to possession of a Class A drug and being concerned in the supply of a Class A drug and had been sentenced to 32 months' imprisonment, the sentence could not be regarded as manifestly excessive. The judge had had the opportunity of hearing the evidence through the conduct of the trial, and had had every opportunity to form his own view on full evidence as to the level of involvement of the defendant and co-defendants. It was possible that the sentence was at the severe end of the scale; however, it was quite impossible to say that it was manifestly excessive.
Lexis®Library
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary

