| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2006] All ER (D) 94 (May) |
| Neutral Citation: | [2006] EWCA Civ 532 |
| Court: | Court of Appeal, Civil Division |
| Judge: | Sir Anthony Clarke MR, Laws and Hallett LJJ |
| Representation | Richard Drabble QC and Zoe Leventhal (instructed by Bindman & Partners) for the claimant. |
| David Pannick QC and David Pievsky (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the Secretary of State. | |
| Adam Clemens (instructed by the Force Solicitor) for the Commissioner. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 8 May 2006 |
Catchwords
Public order - Demonstration - Statutory requirement for organiser of demonstration to apply to police for authorisation - Whether requirement applying to demonstration started before commencement of provision - , s 14 - , s 132.
The Case
When the was construed in its context and having regard to the plain intention of Parliament as deduced from the Parliamentary language, including the disapplication of s14 of the s132(1), on its proper construction, included demonstrations actually starting before the commencement of the Act as surely as those starting after. Those starting before were deemed to start at commencement; and in such cases the words 'when the demonstration starts' in s132(1) referred to the time of commencement.
Practice Areas
Lexis®Library
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary

