| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2006] All ER (D) 137 (May) |
| Court: | Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court) |
| Judge: | Holman J |
| Representation | Deobrah Hay (instructed by Langley Wellington, Gloucester) for the claimant. |
| Paul Greatorex (instructed by Tony Kershaw) for the authority. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 10 May 2006 |
Catchwords
Education - Special educational needs - Educational provision - Statement of special educational needs naming day school - Claimant contending boarding school required for severe asperger's syndrome and related disorders - Tribunal dismissing appeal against statement - Whether tribunal in error.
The Case
The special education needs and disability tribunal had not erred in dismissing the claimant's appeal, which had been based on the needs of her son, H, which she contended required a boarding school rather than the day school as named in his statement of special educational needs.
If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.
Lexis®Library
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
