| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2006] All ER (D) 136 (Mar) |
| Court: | Employment Appeal Tribunal |
| Judge: | Judge McMullen QC, Ms P Tatlow and Mrs R Vickers |
| Representation | David Griffith-Jones QC (instructed by Shaw and Croft) for the employee. |
| Christopher Carr QC and Jonathan Swift (instructed by McDermott Will & Emery LLP) for the employer. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 9 March 2006 |
Catchwords
Employment - Unfair dismissal - Protected disclosure - Legal obligation - Employment tribunal finding no legal obligation identified - Whether tribunal erring - , s 43B.
The Case
The Employment Appeal Tribunal upheld the tribunal's finding that the employee had not been unfairly dismissed, pursuant to s43B of the on the ground that the employee had not been dismissed for 'whistle blowing'.
Practice Areas
If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.
Lexis®Library
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
