| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2006] All ER (D) 110 (Mar) |
| Court: | Chancery Division |
| Judge: | Judge Weeks QC sitting as a judge of the High Court |
| Representation | Andrew Ayres (instructed by Wiseman Lee) for the claimant. |
| Justin Shale (instructed by Yusuf & Baker) for the defendant. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 7 March 2006 |
Catchwords
Trust and trustee - Constructive trust - Unmarried couple - Defendant registered as sole proprietor - Claimant contending defendant a nominee - Consideration of evidence - Whether defendant holding premises on trust for claimant.
The Case
On the evidence, the court refused the claimant's claim for a declaration that the defendant was holding the premises on trust for her on the ground that the defendant had not agreed to hold the premises as a nominee of the claimant.
If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.
Lexis®Library
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
