| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2006] All ER (D) 244 (Feb) |
| Neutral Citation: | [2006] CAT 3 |
| Court: | Competition Appeal Tribunal |
| Judge: | Sir Christopher Bellamy (President), Mr P Clayton and Mr P Grant-Hutchison |
| Representation | Ben Tidswell of Ashurst for the applicants. |
| Jon Turner and George Peretz (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the OFT. | |
| David Farrer QC and James Flynn QC (instructed by Herbert Smith) for the interveners. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 17 February 2006 |
Catchwords
Competition - Competition Appeal Tribunal - Withdrawal of proceedings - Approach of tribunal to possible withdrawal of proceedings - Whether pressure brought to bear on applicants 'proper' - , Ch II.
The Case
The Competition Appeal Tribunal, in giving guidance as to the approach to be taken in relation to the withdrawal of proceedings before the tribunal, held, inter alia, that putting pressure on a litigant to compromise or withdraw pending proceedings might amount to contempt if improper, but not necessarily unlawful, pressure was used, or if the pressure in question was not fair, reasonable and moderate, provided that there was a real risk of prejudice to the proceedings. Any pressure brought to bear on a litigant to settle had to be reasonable and within appropriate and proper limits. Accordingly, in circumstances such as those in the instant case, the tribunal had to consider primarily whether the pressure in question had been 'proper', as pressure which was not 'proper' would not have been 'fair, reasonable and moderate' either.
Practice Areas
Lexis®Library
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary

