| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2006] All ER (D) 39 (Dec) |
| Neutral Citation: | [2006] EWHC 3083 (QB) |
| Court: | Queen's Bench Division |
| Judge: | Eady J |
| Representation | Mark Warby QC (instructed by Henri Brandman & Co) for the claimant. |
| Edward Bartley Jones QC (instructed by Jackson & Canter) for the defendant. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 4 December 2006 |
Catchwords
Confidential information - Injunction against disclosure of information - Interim injunction - Breach of confidence - Claimant conducting adulterous relationship with defendant's wife - Defendant wishing to reveal information about affair to world at large - Whether appropriate to grant interim injunctive relief restraining defendant from revealing information.
The Case
There could be no rule of generality that an adulterer could never obtain an injunction to restrain the publication of matters relating to his adulterous relationship; even an adulterous relationship might attract, at least in certain respects, a legitimate expectation of privacy. In the circumstances of the instant case, the claimant was entitled to an interim injunction restraining the defendant from communicating, directly or indirectly, with the media or on the internet in relation to the subject of the claimant's former adulterous relationship with the defendant's wife.
Practice Areas
Lexis®Library
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary

