| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2007] All ER (D) 143 (Jan) |
| Court: | Employment Appeal Tribunal |
| Judge: | Judge Peter Clark, Mr D Norman and Mr P Parker |
| Judgment Dates: | 6 December 2006 |
Catchwords
Sex discrimination - Employment - Discrimination against a woman - Employee female police sergeant alleging direct sex discrimination and victimisation - Employment tribunal upholding employee's complaints - Whether tribunal erring in its approach.
The Case
A respondent who acted honestly and reasonably to protect his position in outstanding proceedings would not be guilty of victimisation under the Sex Discrimination Act 1995. In the instant case, the employment tribunal had erred in law in deciding that by failing to make an apology to the employee the respondents had not acted honestly and reasonably to protect their position.
Practice Areas
If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.
Lexis®Library
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
