||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 110 (Apr)
||Queen's Bench Division
Nelson J (sitting with assessors)
||The claimant appeared in person.
||Stephen Cottrell (instructed by William Sturges & Co) for the defendant.
||7 April 2006
Solicitor - Retainer - Termination of retainer - Payment of solicitor's costs - Whether termination of retainer disentitling solicitor from recovering costs in excess of the sum already paid.
There was no authority for the proposition that any solicitor who overcharged a client by, for example, 21% in excess of the proper fee, and then insisted upon payment, had automatically terminated his retainer and was unable to recover any part of the costs he had incurred. Such a breach of contract would not taint the whole contract with illegality. In all the circumstances, the master had erred in finding that the defendant firm of solicitors had improperly terminated their retainer so as to be disentitled to any more costs than the sum that they had already been paid.
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary