||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 271 (Apr)
||Queen's Bench Division (Divisional Court)
Keene LJ and Jack J
||Nathaniel Rudolf (instructed by Bagshaws) for the defendant.
||Timothy Spencer (instructed by the Crown Prosecution Service) for the prosecution.
||28 April 2006
Criminal law - Public order - Racially aggravated disorderly conduct - Whether evidence required that conduct complained of actually seen or heard - Whether defendant's conduct motivated by hostility to particular racial group - , s 5(1)(a) - , ss 28(1)(b), 31(1)(c).
For an offence of disorderly conduct under s5(1)(a) of the to be proved, there had to be evidence that someone was able to see or hear the conduct complained of, but the prosecution did not have to call evidence that the conduct had actually been heard or seen.
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary