| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2006] All ER (D) 275 (Apr) |
| Court: | Chancery Division |
| Judge: | Mann J |
| Representation | Rachel Ansell for the defendant. |
| Stephanie Tozer for the claimant. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 28 April 2006 |
Catchwords
Disclosure and inspection of documents - Production of documents - Action for professional negligence - Valuation evidence - Defendant seeking disclosure of certain valuations - Effect of stigma - Whether court should order disclosure.
The Case
There was no justification for ordering disclosure of the documents sought by the defendant. They did not fall within the test laid down in CPR Pt 31.
Practice Areas
If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.
Lexis®Library
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
