||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 167 (Apr)
||Court of Appeal, Criminal Division
Forbes and Davis JJ
||Michael Goldwater (assigned by the Registrar of Criminal Appeals) for the defendant.
||11 April 2006
Sentence - Custodial sentence - Seriousness of offence - Meeting a child following sexual grooming - Purpose of law in relation to grooming - Whether sentence manifestly excessive.
The law was in place to protect young girls from their own sexual immaturity and to punish older men who took advantage of them, accordingly, in the instant case, where the 55-year-old defendant had met and communicated with the 13-year-old complainant before he abducted her and was convicted of meeting her following sexual grooming, it could not be said that the sentence of three-and-a-half years' imprisonment was manifestly excessive.
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary