||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 245 (Apr)
||Court of Appeal, Criminal Division
Pill LJ, Dobbs and Underhill JJ
||Jamas Hodivalla (assigned by the Registrar of Criminal Appeals) for the defendant.
||27 April 2006
Sentence - Custodial sentence - Seriousness of offence - Imprisonment for public protection - Sexual assault - Whether notional determinate sentence manifestly excessive.
A starting point of seven-and-a-half years was too high for offences of sexual assault contrary to s3 of the where the defendant had pressed his penis against women, ejaculating over them without their knowledge or consent. In all the circumstances, the correct starting point would have been four-and-a-half years. For the purposes of imprisonment for public protection under s225 of the a notional determinate sentence of three years would be appropriate, after giving full credit for a guilty plea. A three year determinate sentence would be appropriate for an offence committed before the coming into force of s225.
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary