||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 266 (Apr)
||Queen's Bench Division (Divisional Court)
Scott Baker LJ and Openshaw J
||Stephen Smyth (instructed by MJY Pringle, Portsmouth) for the claimant.
||Kate Lumsden (instructed by the Crown Prosecution Service, Portsmouth) for the prosecution as interested party.
||28 April 2006
Magistrates - Jurisdiction - Youth court - Power of youth court to commit young persons to Crown Court - Offences with which youth charged grave offences - Young offender unlikely to be sentenced to two years' imprisonment or more - Youth court declining jurisdiction - Whether youth court reaching conclusion erroneous in law - (Sentencing) Act 2000, 91.
The youth court had been wrong to decline jurisdiction in respect of an immature 14-year-old charged with offences contrary to ss6 and 7 of the . Although the offences appeared to be very serious, on the facts, the imposition of a sentence in excess of two years, which would have justified committal to the Crown Court under s91, would have been so disproportionate as to amount to an error of law.
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary