Source: All England Reporter
Publisher Citation: [2006] All ER (D) 70 (Apr)
Neutral Citation: [2006] EWCA Civ 386
Court: Court of Appeal, Civil Division
Judge:

Chadwick, Moore-Bick LJJ and Lawrence Collins J

Representation David Railton QC and Shantanu Majumdar (instructed by Nelsons, Leicester) for the claimants.
  Christopher Pymont QC and Jonathan Russen (instructed by Reed Smith Rambaud Charot LLP) for the bank.
Judgment Dates: 6 April 2006

Catchwords

Misrepresentation - Negligent misrepresentation - Bank - Investment product - Nature of product different from explanation given by bank to claimants - Whether misrepresentation corrected by express terms of contract to which claimant put his signature - , s 2(1).

The Case

The claimants could not succeed in showing that there had been negligent misrepresentation on the part of the defendant bank where the true position had appeared clearly from the terms of the very contract which the claimant said it had been induced to enter by the misrepresentation.

Practice Areas

If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.