||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 267 (Apr)
|| EWHC 850 (QB)
||Queen's Bench Division
||Charles Pugh and Hannah Sampson (instructed by Douglas Mann & Co) for the claimant.
||Andrew Hogarth QC (instructed by Veitch Penny) for the defendant.
||28 April 2006
Negligence - Duty to take care - Employer - Duty to protect employee from foreseeable risk of danger to health - Whether defendant in breach of duty of care in failing to take reasonable steps to avoid exposing claimant to health endangering workload leading to psychiatric illness.
The defendant employer had owed the claimant employee, a health visitor, a duty of care to provide her with a reasonably safe system of work and to take steps to protect her from risks that were reasonably foreseeable. Where psychiatric harm to the claimant had been reasonably foreseeable, having regard to the nature and extent of her work, the defendant had been in breach of its duty to the claimant by failing to take steps to replace the claimant's colleagues. The claimant would, accordingly, be awarded damages.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary