||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 122 (Apr)
|| EWCA Civ 389
||Court of Appeal, Civil Division
Sir Mark Potter P, May and Tuckey LJJ
||Michael Swainston QC and Alan Maclean (instructed by Clyde & Co) for the claimants.
||Ali Malek QC (instructed by Linklaters) and Mark Humphries of Linklaters for the first defendant.
||Gavin Kealey QC and David Bailey (instructed by Clifford Chance) for the second defendant.
||10 April 2006
Conflict of laws - Jurisdiction - Civil jurisdiction - Whether relevant reinsurance policy subject to Mauritius jurisdiction clause - Whether trial judge erring in deciding that English law proper law of contract.
The defendants' appeal against a trial judge's decision that the relevant reinsurance policy was not subject to a Mauritius jurisdiction clause was dismissed in circumstances where the trial judge had taken the right approach and there had been no grounds for interfering with his conclusion.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary