| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2005] All ER (D) 269 (Oct) |
| Court: | Employment Appeal Tribunal |
| Judge: | Judge Ansell |
| Representation | Jane Russell (instructed by Avon & Bristol Law Centre) for the employee. |
| Rebecca Dennis (instructed by MLM Solicitors, Cardiff) for the employer. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 24 October 2005 |
Catchwords
Employment - Disability - Discrimination - Employee suffering from depression - Employment tribunal finding employee not disabled within meaning of Act - Whether employee prevented from carrying out her activities - , s 1(1).
The Case
The Employment Appeal Tribunal upheld the decision of the employment tribunal that the employee was not a disabled person, as defined by s1(1) of the as her impairment had not prevented her from carrying out her work activities, on the basis that no fault could be found with the tribunal's decision.
Practice Areas
If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.
Lexis®Library
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
