| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2005] All ER (D) 136 (Oct) |
| Neutral Citation: | [2005] UKHL 56 |
| Court: | House of Lords |
| Judge: | Lord Bingham of Cornhill, Lord Nicholls of Birkenhead, Lord Steyn, Lord Hope of Craighead, Lord Rodger of Earlsferry, Lord Walker of Gestingthorpe, Baroness Hale of Richmond, Lord Carswell and Lord Brown of Eaton-under-Heywood |
| Representation | Sir Sydney Kentridge QC, Richard Lissack QC, Martin Chamberlain and Marcus Haywood (instructed by Allen & Overy LLP) for the claimants. |
| Lord Goldsmith QC, AG, Philip Sales and Clive Lewis (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the Attorney General. | |
| David Pannick QC and Gordon Nardell (instructed by Collyer Bristow) for the intervener, the League against Cruel Sports. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 13 October 2005 |
Catchwords
Constitutional law - Parliament - Legislative power - Whether valid Act of Parliament - , s 2(1) - .
The Case
Judgment
If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.
Lexis®Library
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
