Source: All England Reporter
Publisher Citation: [2005] All ER (D) 256 (Oct)
Court: Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
Judge:

Ouseley J

Representation Paul Bowen (instructed by John Ford) for the claimant.
  James Presland (instructed by Head of Legal Services, Haringey) for the defendant in the first application.
  Rebecca Haynes (instructed by Capsticks) for the defendant in the second application.
Judgment Dates: 21 October 2005

Catchwords

Local authority - Social services - Powers - Provision of respite care - Respite care amounting to medical needs - Whether local authority having power to provide respite care needed - , s 17, - Chronically Sick and Disabled Person Act 1970, ss 2, 28A.

The Case

In the circumstances, the respite care in question, to be provided to the claimants, had not fallen within either s17 and Sch2 to the or ss2 and 28A of the Chronically Sick and Disabled Person Act 1970 such as to give the defendant in the first application, the relevant social services authority, either the power to provide it or the legal duty to do so. However, in the instant case, while the defendant in the second application, performing its NHS health functions, had the relevant power and target duties, no specific duties had crystallised and it had not acted unlawfully in deciding on the care which it had provided.

Practice Areas

If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.