| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2005] All ER (D) 113 (Oct) |
| Neutral Citation: | [2005] EWCA Civ 1182 |
| Court: | Court of Appeal, Civil Division |
| Judge: | Sir Mark Potter P, Keene and Scott Baker LJJ |
| Representation | Simon Cox (instructed by Harrison Bundey) for the appellant. |
| Lisa Giovannini (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the respondent. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 12 October 2005 |
Catchwords
Immigration - Refugee - Asylum - Deportation - Removal directions not issued - Right of appeal - , Immigration and Asylum Act 2002, s 82.
The Case
The claimant's appeal failed because no removal directions had been set. The method of return to the claimant's home area and the route which would be taken in pursuance of such directions were wholly unknown. In such circumstances the claimant was in no position to establish either a well-founded fear of persecution or a risk amounting to a breach of the European Convention on Human Rights, arising solely as a consequence of the method or route of return to his home area.
Practice Areas
If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.
Lexis®Library
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
