| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2005] All ER (D) 329 (Nov) |
| Court: | Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court) |
| Judge: | Davis J |
| Representation | Faisal Saiffee (instructed by Ansons) for the claimant. |
| Robert White (instructed by S Sternberg, Chesterfield) for the first and second defendant. | |
| Timothy Comyn (instructed by Edwards Gildard) for the interested party. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 24 November 2005 |
Catchwords
Town and country planning - Permission for development - Consultation - Whether consultation adequate and sufficient.
The Case
In the circumstances, there had been adequate and sufficient consultation by the first and second defendant local planning authorities as to the coalfield regeneration scheme opposed by the claimant, who was an owner and occupier of a property overlooking the site of the proposed scheme.
Practice Areas
If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.
Lexis®Library
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
