A
- A v B
- Abdulrahman v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Abou-Rahmah and another v Abacha and others
- Adami v Ethical Standards Board for England
- Addax BV Geneva Branch v Coral Suki SA and others
- Aga v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Allmark v Burnham and another
- Almighty Marketing Ltd v Milk Link Ltd
- An NHS Trust v D and others
- Anton Durbeck GmbH v Den Norske Bank ASA
- Argo Capital Investors Fund SPC v Essar Steel Ltd
- Assoukou v Select Services Partners Ltd and others
- ATI EAC Sri e Viaggi di Maio Snc and others v ACTV Venezia SpA and others (Case C-331/04)
- Attorney General's Reference (No 93 of 2005) R v Shobbrook
- Attorney General's Reference (No 80 of 2005) R v Wedlock-Ward
- Autosalone Ispra Snc v European Atomic Energy Community (Case T-250/02)
- Axa Insurance UK plc v Fidelis Insurance Group and others
B
- Bari v General Medical Council
- Barnes v Metropolitan Police Commissioner and another
- Barry v Pugh
- Benjamin v Interlacing Ribbon Ltd
- Biofarma SA v Office of Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Case T-154/03)
- Blackmore v Richardson and others Capital Cabs Ltd v Blackmore
- BP plc v AON Ltd and another
- Bradmount Investments Ltd v Williams De Broe plc and others
- Brindley v Queen's Medical Centre University Hospital NHS Trust
- Britannia Alloys & Chemicals Ltd v European Commission (Case T-33/02)
- Brown v MCASSO Music Productions Ltd
- Buchler v Al-Midani
- Burgess v Plymouth City Council
- Butler v Derby City Council
C
- Cadre SA v Astra Asigurari SA
- Caiach v General Medical Council
- Canning v County of Northampton Coroner
- Carillion Construction Ltd v Devonport Royal Dockyard Ltd
- Carlisle Cumbria United Independent Supporters Society Ltd v Courtnay and others
- Chikwamba v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Church and another v Bakersfield Entertainment Ltd
- Cochrane v A D Bly Construction Ltd
- Combe v Blackburn Hyndburn and Ribble Valley Coroner
- Criminal proceedings concerning Grongaard and another (Case C-384/02)
- Culnane v Morris and another
D
- Datec Electronic Holdings Ltd and another v United Parcels Service Ltd
- De Mulder and another v First Secretary of State and another
- Decoma UK Ltd v Haden Drysys International Ltd
- Deutsches Milch-Kontor GmgH v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas (Case C-136/04)
- Dike v Rickman and another
- Doodes v Gotham and another
- Dr Hans Heubach GmbH & Co KG v European Commission (Case T-64/02)
- Duckett v Patent Office
- Duffield v Cumbria & Lancashire Strategic Health Authority
- Dyson Technology Ltd v Strutt
E
- Ealing London Borough Council v Richardson
- European Commission v Austria (Case C-320/03)
- European Commission v United Kingdom (Case C-131/05)
F
- F T Everard and Sons Ltd v BP Marine Ltd
- Fabric 591 Ltd v Lee
- Feakins v Burstow and another
- Fenchurch Residential Ltd v First Secretary of State and others
- Financial Services Authority v Fradley (trading as Top Bet Placement Services) and another
- Financial Services Authority v Martin and another
- Financial Services Compensation Scheme Ltd v Larnell (Insurances) Ltd
- Finecard International Ltd (trading as The Ninja Corporation) v Urquhart Dyke & Lord (a firm) and another
- Forticrete Ltd v Lafarge Roofing Ltd
- Francis v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
- Fujitsu Computer Products Corp and others v Bax Global Inc
- Fullard and another v Director of Public Prosecutions
G
- GfK AG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Case T-135/04)
- Goldstar Finance plc v Singh and others
- Goundry v Hepworth
- Gover and others v Propertycare Ltd
H
- Hammersmatch Properties Ltd v First Secretary of State and another
- Hatmet Ltd v Herbert (trading as LMS Lift Consultants)
- Henderson v Surrey County Council
- Henry v British Broadcasting Corporation
- Hobden v Almondsbury Care Ltd
- Holman v Howes
- Horsham District Council v Coulsan and another
- HSBC Rail (UK) Ltd v Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd (formerly Railtrack plc)
- Hughes v Office of the Deputy Prime Minister and others
- Hussain v Bahadir
- Hussain v Birmingham City Council and others
- Hutchinson 3G (UK) Ltd v Office of Communications
- Hyams and another v Barclays Bank plc
I
- I v Redbridge London Borough Council and another
- IC Mutual Ltd and others v Raven and others
- IMG Liechti & Cie and others v Tro Essex Music Ltd
- Irontrain Investments Ltd v Ansari
- Islam v Meah
J
- J A Pye (Oxford) Ltd v United Kingdom
- James Hay Pension Trustees Ltd v First Secretary of State and another
- Jegede v The Home Office
- JNF Charitable Trust v Leisrael and another
- Johnson v Perot Systems Europe Ltd and another
- Jones v Vaughan
- Jung and another v Yam and others
K
- K v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Kensington International Ltd v Republic of Congo and others
- Kent v M&L Management & Legal Ltd and another
- Kilcarne Holdings Ltd v Targetfollow (Birmingham) Ltd and another
- Kredenza Ltd v Jovicevic
- Kuwait Airways Corp v Iraqi Airways Corp
L
- Lambrou v Cyprus Airways Ltd
- Lax v Hardy & Hansons plc
- Lever Faberge Ltd v Colgate-Palmolive Ltd
- Liberal Catholic Church Corporation Ltd v Palmer and another
- Liddiard v First Secretary of State and another
- Lynch Hall & Hornby v Thakerar
M
- Manchester City Council v Higgins
- Mando and others v Secretary of State for the Home Department KM v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Mangold v Helm (Case C-144/04)
- Matthews v Neill
- Micro Design Group Ltd and another v Norwich Union Insurance Ltd
- MMI Research Ltd and another v Timson and others
- Monnington v Easier plc
- Mundi v Lincoln Assurance Ltd
- Myatt and others v Browne and others
N
O
P
- P v First Secretary of State and others
- Papworth and another v Co-Operative Insurance Society Ltd Papworth and another v Total Insurance Services Corporation Ltd (trading as Total Claims Management and Total Surveying Services) and another
- Paterson and others v Henshaw and another
- Pearce and another v Elecheck Ltd and another
- Perkin v St George's Charitable Foundation
- Persimmon Homes (Thames Valley) Ltd and others v Stevenage Borough Council
- Petchey v Broker
- PF Sugrue Ltd v Attorney General
- Phillips and others v Avena and another
- Polydor Ltd and others v Woodhouse and others
Q
R
- R (on the application of Al-Khayat) v General Medical Council
- R (on the application of Alamieyeseigha) v Crown Prosecution Service
- R (on the application of E) v A School
- R (on the application of Hall) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- R (on the application of Higham) v University of Plymouth
- R (on the application of Hudson) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- R (on the application of Lauderdale and another) v Mid Sussex Magistrates' Court
- R (on the application of Leeds City Council) v Taxi Centre (Newcastle-Upon-Tyne) Ltd
- R (on the application of Mahmood) v Criminal Injuries Compensation Appeal Panel
- R (on the application of Mlloja) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- R (on the application of Mugisha) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- R (on the application of Mvundi) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- R (on the application of Nadarajah) v Secretary of State for the Home Department R (on the application of Abdi) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- R (on the application of Okandeji) v Bow Street Magistrates Court
- R (on the application of Purshouse) v Chesterfield Borough Council and another
- R (on the application of R and others) v Leeds City Council
- R (on the application of Rahimi) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- R (on the application of Rodriguez-Torres) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- R (on the application of Samuel Smith Old Brewery (Tadcaster)) v Selby District Council
- R (on the application of Takoushis) v Inner London North Coroner and another
- R (on the application of the Northumbria Police Authority) v Broome
- R (on the application of the Revenue and Customs Commissioners) v Raymond Machell QC
- R (on the application of TP) v West London Youth Court
- R (on the application of Vella) v Lambeth London Borough Council
- R (on the application of Walmsley) v Lane and another
- R (on the application of Wembley Field Ltd) v Brent London Borough Council
- R + V Versicherung AG v Risk insurance and Reinsurance Solutions SA and others
- R v Barker
- R v C
- R v Ciantar
- R v Dhillon
- R v Dixon
- R v Dosanjh
- R v Evans
- R v Hodson
- R v Jones
- R v Jones and other appeals
- R v Kumar
- R v L
- R v Maka
- R v Manku
- R v McPeake
- R v Navabi R v Embaye
- R v Neill
- R v Nika
- R v Onile
- R v P
- R v Puaca
- R v Roberts
- R v Salisbury
- R v Slocombe
- R v Smith R v Khela
- R v T
- R v Tompkins
- R v Weir and other appeals
- Raja and others v Van Hoogstraten and others
- Raja v Van Hoogstraten and others
- Ramda v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Re A (children) (contact)
- Re Blastland (application under para 3 of Sch 22 to the Criminal Justice Act 2003)
- Re Burke (application under para 3 of Sch 22 to the Criminal Justice Act 2003)
- Re C (a child) (care order: application to discharge)
- Re Cole (application under para 3 of Sch 22 to the Criminal Justice Act 2003)
- Re Daewoo Motor Co Ltd
- Re Docherty (reference under para 6 of Sch 22 to the Criminal Justice Act 2003)
- Re Dollarland (Manhattan) Ltd
- Re Emmanuel Church, Bentley
- Re Enander
- Re G (a child) (interim care order: residential assessment)
- Re Goddard (application under para 6 of Sch 22 to the Criminal Justice Act 2003)
- Re Greenwood (application under para 3 of Sch 22 to the Criminal Justice Act 2003)
- Re Griffiths (application under para 3 of Sch 22 to the Criminal Justice Act 2003)
- Re H (a child) (contact: domestic violence)
- Re James (application under para 3 of Sch 22 to the Criminal Justice Act 2003)
- Re K and S (children) (contact: domestic violence)
- Re Kentzer (application under para 3 of Sch 22 to the Criminal Justice Act 2003)
- Re Linton Park plc
- Re M (children) (transfer of proceedings to High Court)
- Re M (children: interim care order)
- Re Main (application under para 3 of Sch 22 to the Criminal Justice Act 2003)
- Re Mass Power
- Re Maxwell (reference under para 6 of Sch 22 to the Criminal Justice Act 2003)
- Re Moduspace Ltd
- Re Owalabi
- Re Pate (reference under para 6 of Sch 22 to the Criminal Justice Act 2003)
- Re Pugh (application under para 3 of Sch 22 to the Criminal Justice Act 2003)
- Re Roche (application under para 3 of Sch 22 to the Criminal Justice Act 2003)
- Re Siteburn Ltd Re Siteground Ltd
- Re St Margaret of Scotland, Castletown
- Re W (a child) (removal from jurisdiction)
- Revenue and Customs Commissioners v Vodafone 2
- Rexy Finance Ltd v Morgan Stanley & Co International Ltd
- Rice v Walker and another (trading as Kitchen Shop)
- Riyad Bank and others v Ahli United Bank (UK) plc
- Roberts v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Roeser v Commerzbank AG
- Roiter Zucker (a firm) v Minai
S
- Sadas SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks & Designs) (Case T-346/04)
- Schering-Plough Ltd v Norbrook Laboratories Ltd
- Schroder and another v Decoulos
- Schwarz v Burgermeister der Landeshauptstadt Salzburg (Case C-366/04)
- Senanayake v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Sentencing Guidelines Council (guideline: manslaughter by reason of provocation)
- Setter v Secretary of State for Defence
- Sharma v Yardley and another
- Shawton Engineering Ltd v DGP International Ltd (trading as Design Group Partnership) and another DGP International Ltd (trading as Design Group Partnership) and another v Limit (No 3) Ltd
- Shkembi v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- SHV Gas Supply and Trading SAS v Naftomar Shipping & Trading Co Ltd Inc
- Simonds Farsons Cisk plc v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Case T-3/04)
- Simpson v Peter Edwards Law Solicitors
- Singleton v Law Society
- Smith and other v Howard & Hallam Ltd
- Smith International Inc v Specialised Services Group Ltd
- Smith v Director of Public Prosecutions
- Smith v The Queen
- Societe nouvelle des couleurs zinciques SA v European Commission (Case T-52/02)
- Society of Lloyds v Longtin
- Soffass SpA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks & Designs) (Case T-396/04)
- Stott v Governing Body of St Aelred's Catholic Technology College NHS Foundation Trust
- Stroude v Beazer Homes Ltd and others
- Strutt v East Riding of Yorkshire Council
- Svenska Petroleum Exploration AB v Government of the Republic of Lithuania and another
- Swale Borough Council v First Secretary of State and another
T
- Tajik Aluminium Plant v Ermatov and others
- Talisman Property Co (UK) Ltd v Norton Rose (a firm)
- Tavoulareas v Tsavliris and Sons Maritime Co
- Tera Construction Ltd v Lam
- Thacker and another v Secretary of State for Education and Skills and another
- Thompson v Bradford
- Thompson v Patent Office
- Tidebrook Maritime Corp v Vitol SA of Geneva The “Front Commander”
- Trustees of BT Pension Scheme and others v Revenue and Customs Commissioners
- TTMI Ltd of England v ASM Shipping Ltd of India
- Tube Tech International Ltd v Technip-Coflexip SA and others
U
- Unilin Beheer BV v Information Management Consultancy Ltd
- Union Pigments AS v European Commission (Case T-62/02)
- United Kingdom v European Commission (Case T-178/05)
- Uren v First National Home Finance Ltd
V
W
- Walker-Fox v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
- Ward v South Yorkshire Pensions Authority and another
- Warring-Davies v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
- Waterman v AIT Group plc
- Watt v Tucker
- Weissfisch v Julius and others
- Whalley v Montracon Ltd
- Wilcox and others v Balfour Beatty Power Networks and another
- Wilderbrook Ltd v Oluwu
- Wilson v Galaxy Showers Ltd
- Wyniczenko v Plucinska-Surowka
