||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 382 (May)
||Queen's Bench Division (Divisional Court)
Brooke LJ and Mitting J
||Nigel Ley (instructed by Byrne Frodshaw & Co) for the defendant.
||Alan Blake (instructed by the Crown Prosecution Service) for the prosecution.
||25 May 2005
Road traffic - Drink-driving - Breath test - Testing equipment - Approval of equipment - Subsequent blood test - , ss 7, 8. .
There was no requirement for the prosecution to prove that an intoximeter device used to obtain breath samples remained approved by the Secretary of State before a conviction could be entered on the basis of a voluntary blood sample subsequently provided under s8(2) of the .
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary