| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2005] All ER (D) 382 (May) |
| Court: | Queen's Bench Division (Divisional Court) |
| Judge: | Brooke LJ and Mitting J |
| Representation | Nigel Ley (instructed by Byrne Frodshaw & Co) for the defendant. |
| Alan Blake (instructed by the Crown Prosecution Service) for the prosecution. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 25 May 2005 |
Catchwords
Road traffic - Drink-driving - Breath test - Testing equipment - Approval of equipment - Subsequent blood test - , ss 7, 8. .
The Case
There was no requirement for the prosecution to prove that an intoximeter device used to obtain breath samples remained approved by the Secretary of State before a conviction could be entered on the basis of a voluntary blood sample subsequently provided under s8(2) of the .
If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.
Lexis®Library
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
