||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 116 (May)
||Court of Appeal, Criminal Division
Gage LJ, Hedley and Fulford JJ
||Gopal Hooper (assigned by the Registrar of Criminal Appeals) for the defendant.
||Andrew Evans (instructed by the Crown Prosecution Service) for the Crown.
||10 May 2005
Criminal evidence and procedure - Evidence - Sufficiency of evidence - Correctness of judge's decision to leave case to jury.
In a case where a defendant had been charged with numerous counts of false accounting and obtaining property by deception, the judge had, on the evidence, properly distinguished between the counts which were left for the jury's consideration and the those which were withdrawn on a submission of a no case to answer.
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary