||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 214 (Jul)
||Court of Appeal, Civil Division
Pill LJ, Sir Peter Gibson and Rimer J
||Christopher Jacobs (instructed by Miles Hutchinson & Lithgow) for the claimant.
||Kieron Beal (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the Secretary of State.
||15 July 2005
Immigration - Leave to enter - Refugee - Asylum - Human Rights claim - Fear of persecution from non-state agents - Refusal of claim - Whether tribunal having sufficiently considered medical reports and human rights violations - European Convention on Human Rights arts 3 and 8.
Where an immigration appeal tribunal had dismissed the claimant's appeal against the refusal of his application for asylum, the tribunal had been entitled to consider that the claimant should be returned to Serbia, and it had had sufficient regard to arts3 and 8 in reaching that determination. The tribunal had not erred in determining that there had been sufficient support for the claimant on his return and that the claimant had not pursued all available treatment for his depression.
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary