||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 494 (Jul)
||Employment Appeal tribunal
Judge Reid QC, Mr J Hougham and Mr D Welch
||The appellant appeared in person.
||Oliver Segal (instructed by Thompsons) for the union.
||28 July 2005
Trade union - Rules - Breach of rules - Disciplinary proceedings - Subsequent exclusion of respondent from union conferences - Whether respondent 'unjustifiably disciplined' - (Consolidation) Act 1992, ss 64, 65.
The certification officer of the appellant union had erred in holding that the union had acted in breach of its disciplinary rules in excluding the respondent from its conferences, as, in excluding the respondent from attending its conferences as a member of the public, the union had not been purporting to subject the respondent to a disciplinary process. Accordingly, a decision dismissing the respondent's application would be substituted for the certification officer's decision.
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary