| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2005] All ER (D) 360 (Dec) |
| Neutral Citation: | [2005] EWCA Civ 1605 |
| Court: | Court of Appeal, Civil Division |
| Judge: | Sir Anthony Clarke MR, Rix and Richards LJJ |
| Representation | Paul Bowen (instructed by Bindmans) for the claimant. |
| Angus McCullough (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the defendant. | |
| Tim Ward (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the Secretary of State for the Home Department as interested party. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 21 December 2005 |
Catchwords
Mental health - Mental health review tribunal - Discharge of restricted patient - Standard of proof - Whether standard of proof to be applied by tribunal ordinary civil standard of proof on balance of probabilities - Whether tribunal to apply standard of proof to all issues to be determined - , ss 72, 73.
The Case
The standard of proof to be applied by a Mental Health Review Tribunal, when determining all issues concerning whether to discharge a restricted patient under ss72 or 73 of the was that of the ordinary civil standard of proof on the balance of probabilities.
Practice Areas
If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.
Lexis®Library
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary

