Source: All England Reporter
Publisher Citation: [2005] All ER (D) 16 (Aug)
Neutral Citation: [2005] EWHC 1771 (QB)
Court: Queen's Bench Division
Judge:

Gray J

Representation Jeremy Morgan QC (instructed by Thompsons) for the claimant.
  Ian McLaren QC (instructed by Langleys) for the defendant.
Judgment Dates: 3 August 2005

Catchwords

Contract - Variation - Incorporation of terms - Claimant's union retaining solicitors for claimant - Claimant and solicitors signing collective conditional fee agreement - Solicitors subsequently informing claimant of agreement by letter - Whether letter effective to vary initial retainer - Whether costs order in claimant's favour in breach of indemnity principle.

The Case

On the defendant's appeal against a decision of the costs judge that the claimant had been entitled to claim a success fee from a certain date, and that there had been no breach of the indemnity principle, the court dismissed the appeal, taking the view that there had been a subsequent variation in the solicitor's retainer, with the effect that the terms of the relevant collective conditional fee arrangement had been incorporated, entitling the claimant to claim a success fee. It further decided that the costs order in favour of the claimant had not offended the indemnity principle.

Practice Areas

If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.