||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 291 (Apr)
||Court of Appeal, Criminal Division
Rose LJ, Curtis and Bodey JJ
||Jonathan Anders (assigned by the Registrar of Criminal Appeals) for the defendant.
||Emily Culverhouse (instructed by the Crown Prosecution Service) for the Crown.
||21 April 2005
Criminal evidence and procedure - Trial - Direction to jury - Prohibition on cross-admissibility of evidence between counts - Failure to direct jury that prohibition operating in both directions - Safety of conviction.
In a case where a recorder had directed the jury that they were not permitted to consider the evidence on one count in relation to another, although he had failed to direct the jury that the prohibition operated in the other direction, that that had been so would clearly have been understood from the totality of the summing-up.
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary