||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 363 (Apr)
||Court of Appeal, Criminal Division
Gage LJ, Curtis and Cox JJ
||Emma Nott (assigned by the Registrar for Criminal Appeals) for the defendant.
||Toby Fitzgerald (instructed by the Crown Prosecution Service) for the Crown.
||26 April 2005
Criminal evidence and procedure - Evidence - Sexual offence - Cross-examination of complainant - Correctness of judge's decision to refuse cross-examination in respect of previous complaints - Conviction unsafe - , s 41.
In the circumstances of the instant case, the judge should have permitted the defendant to cross-examine the complainant as to previous, unsubstantiated complaints made by her. There had been material on which the jury could have concluded that the previous allegations had been false. The convictions for sexual assault and common assault would be quashed.
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary