||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 152 (Sep)
|| EWHC 2139 (Comm)
||Christopher Symons QC (instructed by Herbert Smith) for the claimant.
||Adrian Beltrami (instructed by Fox Williams) for the defendant.
||24 September 2004
Conflict of laws - Jurisdiction - Forum non conveniens - Stay of proceedings - Insurance - Proceedings issued in New York and London - Appropriate forum.
In the circumstances of the case, New York was the appropriate forum for the dispute between the claimant insurer and the defendant assured concerning the cover provided by a master policy of insurance, since although the master policy was governed by English law, the significance of English law to the issues was minimal, and to the extent that it might arise, could readily be addressed in New York. Moreover, the advantages of single case management in the location of the loss, in the court in which insurers themselves had chosen to pursue claims under the local policy, and in accordance with the commercial insurance arrangement between the defendant and its insurers collectively, pointed inexorably to New York.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary