| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2004] All ER (D) 245 (Nov) |
| Court: | Employment Appeal Tribunal |
| Judge: | Judge Wakefield, Mr I Ezekiel and Baroness Prosser |
| Representation | The employee did not appear and was not represented. |
| Martin Thomson (instructed by Noden & Co) of the employer. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 21 September 2004 |
Catchwords
Employment - Employment tribunal - Procedure - Tribunal upholding decision on review - Correctness of decision - Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2001, SI 2001/1171, r 4(8).
The Case
The Employment Appeal Tribunal allowed the employer's appeal against the decision of the employment tribunal confirming a previous tribunal's decision, striking out its notice of appearance and making a debarring order, on the basis that the appeal tribunal had been persuaded that the reviewing tribunal had not properly addressed the relevant matters.
Practice Areas
If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.
Lexis®Library
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
