||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 116 (Oct)
||Ashley Roughton (instructed Cripps Harries Hall) for the claimant.
||Mark Chacksfield (instructed by Bright & Sons) for the first defendant.
||Denise McFarland (instructed by Olswang) for the second defendant.
||11 October 2004
Civil costs - Order for costs - Discretion - Claimant acting precipitously - Justification for ordering costs against claimant.
The defendants' application for their costs of, and incidental to, the claimant's without notice application for relief was allowed on the basis that the claimant had acted precipitously and without sufficient justification in its application.
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary