||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 201 (Nov)
|| EWCA Civ 1481
||Court of Appeal, Civil Division
Chadwick, Sedley and Dyson LJJ
||Michael Fordham and David Pievsky (instructed by the Public Law Project) for the claimant.
||Robin Tam (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the Secretary of State.
||12 November 2004
Immigration - Asylum - Pilot fast track scheme - Fairness.
The three factors the court had to weigh in order to determine whether the scheme was unfair were: the individual interest at issue; the benefits to be derived from added procedural safeguards; and the costs to the administration of compliance. Those factors, however, were not of equal weight administrative convenience could not justify unfairness. There had to be in asylum procedures an irreducible minimum of due process. Applying those principles, the Court of Appeal determined that the fast track pilot scheme at Harmondsworth Removal Centre to deal with certain asylum claims within a three-day timetable was not unlawful.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary