| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2004] All ER (D) 430 (May) |
| Neutral Citation: | [2004] EWHC 1233 (Admin) |
| Court: | Divisional Court |
| Judge: | Maurice Kay LJ and Moses J |
| Representation | Mark Summers (instructed by Attridge) for the claimant. |
| John Hardy (instructed by the Crown Prosecution Service) for the government of Italy. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 28 May 2004 |
Catchwords
Extradition - Committal proceedings - Evidence - Identification - Exclusion - s 9(2).
The Case
Where co-conspirators were the subject of separate extradition requests, but the committal hearing was conjoined and the committal charges related to conspiracies to which all the co-conspirators were said to have been parties, there was no reason why the district judge should have been inhibited from relying on authenticated material in one of the co-conspirator's file to prove identification in the case of one of the other co-conspirators.
If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.
Lexis®Library
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
