||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 165 (Sep)
|| EWCA Crim 1656
||Court of Appeal, Criminal Division
Grigson and Andrew Smith JJ
||Adrian Eissa (assigned by the Registrar of Criminal Appeals) for the defendant.
||21 May 2004
Sentencing - Theft - Assault - Burglary - Aggravated vehicle taking - Detention and training order - Disparity.
In the circumstances of the case, the sentence passed by the judge of 12 months' detention and a training order on each count to be served concurrently following guilty pleas to offences of theft, and an assault occasioning actual bodily harm, to attempted theft, burglary and aggravated vehicle taking was entirely proper. However, the apparent discrepancy between the defendant and her co-defendants which arose on account of a period which the defendant had been remanded in custody, had to be recognised; the appropriate sentence was one of six months, and the detention and training order would run for that period.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary