| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2004] All ER (D) 86 (May) |
| Court: | Administrative Court |
| Judge: | Maurice Kay LJ and Rafferty J |
| Representation | Amjad Malik (instructed by the Crown Prosecution Service) for the prosecution. |
| The defendant appeared in person. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 7 May 2004 |
Catchwords
Road traffic - Motor vehicles - Motor cycles - Protective helmets - Requirement for safety cell vehicles - Motor Cycles (Protective Helmets) Regulations 1998, , reg 4.
The Case
Having regard to Regulation4 of the Motor Cycles (Protective Helmets) Regulations 1998, , even if a defendant was in the safety cell or covered by any safety frame of a motorcycle, he would still be the driver of the motorcycle and subject to the requirement to wear the specified protective headgear.
If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.
Lexis®Library
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
