||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 554 (Mar)
|| EWCA Civ 393
||Court of Appeal, Civil Division
Waller and Carnwath LJJ
||Peter Crampin QC and Ulick Staunton (instructed by Robert C Seeckts, Solicitors) for the claimant.
||Joseph Harper QC and Stephen Bickford-Smith (instructed by William A Merrick & Co) for the defendants.
||30 March 2004
Boundaries - Delimitation of boundary - Plan attached to conveyance - T-marks - Judge relying on T-marks in resolving boundary dispute - Correctness of decision.
In the circumstances of the case, the judge at first instance had been entitled to rely on 'T-marks' on a plan attached to a conveyance in finding for the claimant's favour in a boundary dispute case.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary