| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2004] All ER (D) 554 (Mar) |
| Neutral Citation: | [2004] EWCA Civ 393 |
| Court: | Court of Appeal, Civil Division |
| Judge: | Waller and Carnwath LJJ |
| Representation | Peter Crampin QC and Ulick Staunton (instructed by Robert C Seeckts, Solicitors) for the claimant. |
| Joseph Harper QC and Stephen Bickford-Smith (instructed by William A Merrick & Co) for the defendants. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 30 March 2004 |
Catchwords
Boundaries - Delimitation of boundary - Plan attached to conveyance - T-marks - Judge relying on T-marks in resolving boundary dispute - Correctness of decision.
The Case
In the circumstances of the case, the judge at first instance had been entitled to rely on 'T-marks' on a plan attached to a conveyance in finding for the claimant's favour in a boundary dispute case.
Practice Areas
If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.
Lexis®Library
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
