| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2004] All ER (D) 332 (Mar) |
| Neutral Citation: | [2004] EWHC 474 (Ch) |
| Court: | Chancery Division |
| Judge: | Laddie J |
| Representation | Martin Howe QC and James Abrahams (instructed by DLA) for the claimant. |
| Christopher Floyd QC and Adrian Speck (instructed by Taylor Wessing) for the defendant. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 17 March 2004 |
Catchwords
Patents - Infringement - Declaration as to non-infringement sought by potential infringer - Construction of patent.
The Case
Patents and their claims were intended to be a statement made by the patentee to the relevant public. Their meaning and effect should be discernible from the face of the patent itself.
Practice Areas
If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.
Lexis®Library
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
