| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2004] All ER (D) 549 (Mar) |
| Neutral Citation: | [2004] EWHC 699 (Admin) |
| Court: | Divisional Court |
| Judge: | Lord Woolf CJ, Rose LJ and Royce J |
| Representation | John Lofthouse (instructed by Peach Grey & Co, Southampton) for the first claimant |
| James Leonard (instructed by Sharman & Co, Southampton) for the second claimant. | |
| Anthony Hacking QC (instructed by the Crown Prosecution Service, Winchester) for the prosecution, as first interested party. | |
| David Perry (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the Department for Constitutional Affairs, as second interested party. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 17 March 2004 |
Catchwords
Criminal evidence and procedure - Prosecution of offences - Custody time limits - Extension - Interpretation of statute - s 22(3).
The Case
The court certified two questions concerning the extension of custody time limits as points of general public importance, but refused permission to appeal to the House of Lords.
If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.
Lexis®Library
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
