| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2004] All ER (D) 270 (Jun) |
| Court: | Chancery Division |
| Judge: | Pumfrey J |
| Representation | Mark Engleman (instructed by Gensen & Son) for the claimant. |
| Tom Hinchcliffe (instructed by Lincolns) for the defendants. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 24 June 2004 |
Catchwords
Civil costs - Security for costs - Company - Exercise of discretion - Consideration of relevant evidence - s 726(1).
The Case
The court dismissed the defendants' application for security for costs pursuant to s726(1) of the on the ground that the requirements of the statute relating to the claimant company's inability to pay the defendants' costs had not been met.
If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.
Lexis®Library
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
