| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2004] All ER (D) 316 (Jun) |
| Neutral Citation: | [2004] EWCA Crim 1648 |
| Court: | Court of Appeal, Criminal Division |
| Judge: | Waller LJ, Davis and David Clarke JJ |
| Representation | Anthony Arlidge QC and John Lodge (instructed by Bark & Co) for the defendant. |
| William Harbage QC and Catarina Sjolin (instructed by the Crown Prosecution Service) for the Crown. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 28 June 2004 |
Catchwords
Criminal evidence and procedure - Trial - Jury - Inconsistent verdicts - Verdicts not logically inconsistent - Safety of conviction.
The Case
The defendant's conviction of buggery of two complainants was safe because there was no logical inconsistency with acquittals of buggery in respect of one of the two complainants.
If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.
Lexis®Library
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
