Source: All England Reporter
Publisher Citation: [2004] All ER (D) 363 (Jun)
Neutral Citation: [2004] EWCA Civ 827
Court: Court of Appeal, Civil Division
Judge:

Ward, Arden LJJ and Sir William Aldous

Representation Christopher Carr QC, Philip Marshall and Hannah Brown (instructed by Howrey Simon Arnold & White) for the claimants.
  John Wardell QC and Jonathan Evans (instructed by Withers LLP) for the defendants.
Judgment Dates: 30 June 2004

Catchwords

Practice and procedure - Unless order - Failure to comply - Relief from sanctions - Judgment entered in default of compliance - CPR 3.9, .

The Case

While an appeal against a refusal to set aside a judgment entered in default of compliance with an order of the court might be described as procedural, and trial judges had to be given a margin of discretion in procedural matters, none the less the court had to be satisfied that that there had been no error of law, that all the relevant factors (and no others) had been taken into account and that, looking at the matter overall, the judge's conclusion was not plainly wrong.

Practice Areas

If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.