| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2004] All ER (D) 15 (Jan) |
| Court: | Court of Justice of the European Communities |
| Judge: | Judges Jann (President), Edward and La Pergola |
| Judgment Dates: | 12 January 2004 |
Catchwords
European Communities - Competition - Agreements restricting competition - Cement production - Commission ruling that applicants infringing rules on competition - Applicants alleging essential procedural requirements infringed during the administrative procedure - Decision of commission upheld by court of first instance - Correctness of decision.
The Case
On an appeal from a decision of the Court of First Instance by which it had upheld a finding of the European Commission that the applicants had engaged in anti-competitive behaviour, the European Court of Justice held, inter alia, that the court could not have annulled the contested decision unless it had been found that the lack of proper access to the investigation file given to the undertakings concerned during the administrative procedure had prevented them from perusing documents which were likely to be of use in their defence and had thus infringed their rights of defence.
Practice Areas
Lexis®Library
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary

