| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2004] All ER (D) 383 (Feb) |
| Court: | Court of Appeal, Criminal Division |
| Judge: | Laws LJ, Goldring and Keith JJ |
| Representation | Steven Everett (assigned by the Registrar of Criminal Appeals) for the first defendant. |
| Robert Trevor-Jones (assigned by the Registrar of Criminal Appeals) for the second defendant. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 24 February 2004 |
Catchwords
Sentencing - Young offender - Detention and training order - Defendants pleading guilty at different stage to co-defendant - Defendants serving period on remand - Co-defendant on bail - Disparity.
The Case
The defendants' sentences of 18-month detention and training orders were disparate from the co-defendant's sentence of a 24-month detention and training order because the judge had failed to take sufficient account of the fact that preceding sentence, the defendants had been remanded in custody for five months, whilst the co-defendant had been released on bail.
If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.
Lexis®Library
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
