| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2004] All ER (D) 254 (Feb) |
| Court: | Court of Appeal, Criminal Division |
| Judge: | Potter LJ, Hooper and Astill JJ |
| Representation | Glenn Harris (assigned by the Registrar of Criminal Appeals) for the first defendant. |
| Peter Wilcock (assigned by the Registrar of Criminal Appeals) for the second defendant. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 16 February 2004 |
Catchwords
Sentencing - Custodial sentence - Duration - Aggravating features - Role as organisers - Premeditation and legitimate business used to cover up offences - Disparity.
The Case
The first defendant's sentence of 21 months' imprisonment and the second defendant's sentence of 18 months' imprisonment for an offence contrary to s170 of the was not manifestly excessive taking into account the aggravating features of the offence and parity of sentences, and would therefore be upheld.
If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.
Lexis®Library
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
