| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2004] All ER (D) 15 (May) |
| Court: | Employment Appeal Tribunal |
| Judge: | Burton J |
| Judgment Dates: | 24 February 2004 |
Catchwords
Employment - Employment Appeal Tribunal - Preliminary hearing - Directions - Failure to comply with orders - Failure to attend hearing to explain failure to comply - Claimant debarred from pursuing appeal - Employment Appeal Tribunal Rules 1993, , rule 26.
The Case
The employee's conduct in past litigation combined with his failure to comply with the directions clearly demonstrated that he would continue to refuse to comply with any future practice directions made. Accordingly, pursuant to rule26 of the Employment Appeal Tribunal Rules 1993, the employee would be debarred from taking further steps in his appeal.
Practice Areas
If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.
Lexis®Library
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
