||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 299 (Dec)
||Court of Appeal, Civil Division
Pill, Sedley and Thomas LJJ
||Nicole Sandells (instructed by Drydens, Bradford) for the claimant.
||The defendant did not appear and was not represented.
||17 December 2004
Mortgage - Mortgagee - Action for possession - Possession order - Sale of property - Failure to obtain proper price - Correctness of decision.
In a case where the claimant company, in repossessing the defendant's property for default in mortgage payments, had failed to satisfy the test that all reasonable steps had been met in the marketing and sale of the property, resulting in the property being sold at an undervalue, the judge had erred in having not awarded the claimant the difference between the undervalue and the mortgage debt.
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary