| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2004] All ER (D) 336 (Apr) |
| Court: | Administrative Court |
| Judge: | Elias J |
| Representation | Oliver Hyams (instructed by Ashok Patel & Co) for the claimant. |
| Fiona Scolding (instructed by Sally Lister) for the local education authority. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 30 April 2004 |
Catchwords
Education - Special educational needs - Tribunal - Appeal against tribunal's decision - Issue not raised before tribunal.
The Case
In all the circumstances, the Special Educational Needs and Disability Tribunal had properly considered all relevant matters and had not considered irrelevant matters when deciding to specify a particular school in the claimant's son's statement of special educational needs. The claimant would not be permitted to take an argument not raised before the tribunal.
If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.
Lexis®Library
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
